Questions

What developments have taken place in recent years and decades?

What are the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of current concepts and/or approaches (critical analysis)?
What are the controversies and inconsistencies between the different schools of thought with respect to industrial safety?

What is safety culture? Is there such a thing as a good or bad culture? Can a culture be changed?

To what extent has the industry bought-in to these concepts?
What are the current results and limitations?


Results

Safety Cultures, Safety Models

Taking Stock and Moving Forward

Discover this Springer


 

Further reading

Reading advice

 

analysis

The strategic analysis

The Foncsi carried out a strategic analysis on this subject between 2015 and 2018.

Methodology

Strategic analysis is a working methodology developed by the Foncsi. It aims to ensure high-level research over a particularly short period (18-24 months), and to establish a continuum of innovation between research and industry.

There are four key stages:

  1. The state of the art
  2. The international academic seminar
  3. Comparison with industrial practices
  4. The industrial seminar

 

Find out more about strategic analyses

 

The project team for this analysis



Experts from companies and associated organizations

  • Franck Guarnieri (CRC Mines ParisTech)
  • Olivier Guillaume (EDF R&D)
  • Nicolas Herchin (Engie)
  • Jean-Christophe Le Coze (Ineris)
  • Christian Neveu (SNCF)
  • Philippe Noël (TotalEnergies)
  • Dounia Tazi (Icsi)


Scientific experts

  • René Amalberti, Foncsi manager
  • Corinne Bieder, Enac
  • François Daniellou, Scientific Director Foncsi
  • Claude Gilbert, CNRS
  • Benoît Journé, University of Nantes
  • Caroline Kamaté, Foncsi Program Manager
  • Hervé Laroche, ESCP Europe Paris